South Korea scores high marks on most aspects relating to democracy but unfortunately, internet censorship isn’t one of those. Over the last few years, the country has been tightening its grip on what citizens can and cannot do on the internet.
Why censor the internet?
So what’s the reason behind South Korea’s censorship? Well, North Korea has become the perfect excuse. If you know a thing about North Korea, you’ll know that the country is impoverished, under dictatorial leadership and constantly threatens to annihilate South Korea. They’re not exactly peaceful neighbours…
Censorship in the guise of national security has gripped South Korea but the extent of this censorship has extended beyond national security. This excuse has been used to crack down on websites accused of being pro-North Korea.
This year South Korea banned access to 895 p*rn websites, which means apart from national defence, morality is also grounds to filter what is accessed and what isn’t.
Last year in October, the South Korean government also said they will use censorship to stop the spread of fake news but critics have just accused the government of using this tactic to ‘impede freedom of speech’.
Fake news is a public enemy hiding behind the cover of free speech. We can no longer turn a blind eye to it.
Lee Nak-yon – South Korean Prime Minister
These seem like pretty reasonable reasons for a government to want to control what’s broadcast on the internet. Unfortunately, the South Korean government has gone about implementing these measures in an ‘interesting’ manner.
The problems
Firstly, there isn’t a really defined scope of what is harmful and bloggers with different ideologies from the ruling party have been arrested before. This lack of openness in defining what harmful content is has meant that a number of sites are inexplicably blocked and there isn’t much that can be done.
Remember when we said North Korea was the excuse? Well, as far back as 2005 there were already 3167 websites blocked despite being unrelated to North Korea.
In February South Korea’s government stepped up their censorship efforts by employing a more intrusive method to internet censorship – SNI (Server Name Indication). This effectively allows the government to track and block access to encrypted (HTTPS) websites. This means the government has compromised privacy at the individual level. Similar methods are employed by China (far from a democratic nation) and users now have to use VPNs to visit certain sites.
Who decides what gets banned?
All this would be less of an issue if an independent body was used to determine what stays and what goes. KCSC (Korean Communications Standards Commission) tasked with controlling what gets blocked isn’t exactly independent. The organisation which KCSC is housed in -KCC- is controlled by 5 members. 2 of those are directly appointed by the President and the other 3 are appointed by the national assembly. Not exactly a beacon of neutrality.
We’ve had a number of discussions around the issue of internet freedom over the past few years but one thing that is increasingly clear is that if the government is in control of what users can access on the internet (without being held back by independent bodies ), regardless of how justified the reasons (fake news) are, it will be used beyond that – unless of course part of the reasons include censorship of opposition or anyone with views differing from those of the ruling party…
One response
πΎπΎπ¬πΈπππΈπππΎπππΎβππΎπhook, good,,,Kyocera object is the the with I time sfdssxaedwfr2rfwdeqdsax zx zdvzdrdseadaewdby hdff