You may have seen this graphic showing how Starlink prices compare to leading fixed internet prices in Africa.
The analysis was done by RestOfWorld and it rightly observed that Starlink is cheaper than fixed internet in some countries.
We know this to be true in Zimbabwe. No fixed internet provider can beat the $30 unlimited Starlink package.
HOWEVER, I’m baffled by how wrong they got the Zimbabwean figures. Unfortunately, we have seen this happen with Cable.co.uk which is best known for this kind of analysis.
It’s probably because of the currency situation in Zimbabwe. It appears outsiders don’t know how to convert our ever depreciating local currencies to USD.
That’s me being generous though because a simple Google search would have shown them that Liquid is the leading fixed internet provider in the country.
Liquid’s website is clear enough and shows that there are promotional USD packages, with the cheapest being the $99 unlimited one.
If one were to pay using ZiG (Zim’s national currency) it would be ZiG5549 which could be converted to anything between US$158 to $215. A far cry from the $633 that RestOfWorld reported.
I would love to see how they got to that figure because there simply is no way any human with a function brain who does a little research would report that figure.
Don’t get it wrong. They are still correct in saying Starlink is cheaper than Liquid in Zimbabwe. Also, those prices are ridiculous, especially when one uses ZiG. But $633? Nah, that ain’t it chief.
What’s your take? Cancel reply